From 63f07c0374fc2527f095d07154500c4adc899d19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Camron Blackburn <camron.blackburn@cba.mit.edu> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:50:39 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index b98ef14..9c0c3cb 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ so we're targeting filter material able to block particles with minimum ~0.25um - CMAD: count median aerodynamic diameter -### conventional test methods +## Filtration efficiency tests +### biological challenge particles - Henderson apparatus: generates closed circuit microbial aerosols from a Collison nebulizer at a controlled humidity - Collison nebulizer - generally a pneumatic atomizer [^collisonNebulizer] -  @@ -36,9 +37,24 @@ so we're targeting filter material able to block particles with minimum ~0.25um - Bacillus atrophaeus : 0.95-1.25um, 10^7 cfu in challenge [^DIYmask] - Bacteriophage MS2 MCIMB10108: single strange RNA ~20nm diameter, 10^9 pfu in challenge [^DIYmask] - E. Coli phi174 [^VFEreport] +- Viable particle cascade impactor (andersen sampler) for collecting particles, incubating them for a day or two, then counting bacteria or phage growth performance difference between pleated hydrophobic filters and electrostatic filters?? +### non-biological challenge particles +- send colliodal spheres through atomizer (what's the diff between nebulizer and atomizer?) and use optical particel counter (OPC) to determine filtration efficiency +- ASTM standards uses latex spheres. could potentially use gold particles +- charge neutralizer recommended - but Lorena said viruses are typically polarized so maybe charge neutralization could be ignored initially + + +## shopping list +- nebulizer for aerosolization [^nebulizer_selection] + - three-jet Collison nebulizer? +- impinger for collection +- wet and dry thermometer / hygrometer for humidity +- andersen sampler?? could be nice to bin different size particles - six-stage viable particle cascade impactor + + ### Resources [^DIYmask]: University of Cambridge [DIY mask efficacy testing](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258525804_Testing_the_Efficacy_of_Homemade_Masks_Would_They_Protect_in_an_Influenza_Pandemic) [^filterPerformance]: AR Wilkes [The bacterial and viral filtration performance of breathing system filters](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01327.x) @@ -49,13 +65,3 @@ performance difference between pleated hydrophobic filters and electrostatic fil [^VFEreport]: [Nelson Laboratories: Viral Filtration Efficiency (VFE) at increased challenge level](https://gitlab.cba.mit.edu/pub/coronavirus/tracking/uploads/164d119b5a7a5751c685a6677378668a/ER_2235600_Attachment_5_Viral_Filtration_Efficiency.pdf) [^nelson]: [Nelson lab filtration test](https://www.nelsonlabs.com/testing/bacterial-viral-filtration-efficiency-bfe-vfe/?industry=medical-devices&category=protective-barriers-material-performance) [^nebulizer_selection]: [Nebulizer selection from CH tech](http://chtechusa.com/Manuals/Selecting%20the%20Model%20and%20Configuration%20Instructions.pdf) - -## needed for testing apparatus -- nebulizer for aerosolization [^nebulizer_selection] - - three-jet Collison nebulizer? -- impinger for collection -- wet and dry thermometer / hygrometer for humidity -- andersen sampler?? could be nice to bin different size particles - six-stage viable particle cascade impactor -- -- -- \ No newline at end of file -- GitLab