Commit be21af1c authored by Camron Blackburn's avatar Camron Blackburn

Update README.md

parent ba276bc7
# Characterizing Filter media
This is a tracking page to follow the filter efficiency and physical properties of various types of face mask or ventilator filter materials - a central page to compare NOISH-approved N95 masks to new materials developed by the larger CBA COVID repsonse team ([electrospining](https://tourlomousis.pages.cba.mit.edu/cvd-electrospinning/), [rotary jet](https://gitlab.cba.mit.edu/camblackburn/rotary_jet_spinning) ) to DIY materials that could be easily sourced or readily available.
With the CDC now recommending everyone uses any type of makeshift mask before going out in public to protect against transmitting covid-19, and as more people become caretakers for sick family members, we should get a quantitative measurement of which type of household items are best for transmission protection, breathability, and longenvity.
Similar questions have been asked and answered before - [Effficiency of homemade masks](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258525804_Testing_the_Efficacy_of_Homemade_Masks_Would_They_Protect_in_an_Influenza_Pandemic), [filtering performance of 20 protective fabrics](https://gitlab.cba.mit.edu/pub/coronavirus/tracking/-/blob/master/docs/FilteringPerformances.pdf), etc. - this projects exists to verify and expand these findings, specialize them to known [SARS-CoV-2 aerosol Characteristics](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.08.982637v1.abstract), and provide an inital comparison for novel materials.
filtration efficiency testing is inspired by ASTM standards [F2299](https://www.astm.org/Standards/F2299.htm) and [F2101](https://www.astm.org/Standards/F2101.htm), but it's NOT intended to replace or be as rigorous as NOISH testing - more details [here](https://gitlab.cba.mit.edu/camblackburn/filter_testing). the hope is two fold: (1) to provide convenient testing for materials developed in house before sending them to more rigorous and qualified testing labs, and (2) to provide comparative insight backed by quantitative measurement to the growing DIY mask movement.
*click the mask name for **more images & details***
| mask name | material layers | filter efficiency (%)| imgs | avg fiber width (um) | thickness (mm) | weight (g) of 1 cm^3 |
|-----------------|:----------------|:------------------|:-----|:---------------------|:---------------|----------------------|
| [3M N95](./3M_N95/3MN95.md) | 1 | coming .. | <img src="./3M_N95/SEM/3MN95_nosputter_top_0003.jpg" height="400"> | 23 | 0.721 | 0.0225 |
| [Gerson N95](./Gerson_N95/gersonN95.md ) | 3 | . . soon . . | <img src="./Gerson_N95/SEM/GersonN95_nosputter_top_0004.jpg" height="400"> | 21 | 1.076 | 0.0306 |
| [Kimberly-Clark 47117](./KC_47117/KC47117.md) | 3 | . . ish | <img src="./KC_47117/SEM/KC47117_20sputter_middlelayer_0005.jpg" height="400"> | 5 | 0.184 | 0.0067 |
Masks chatacterized: \
[3M N95](./3M_N95/README.md) \
[Gerson N95](./Gerson_N95/readme.md) \
[Kimberly-Clark 47117](./KC_47117/readme.md)
## Measurement methods
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment